Snakes org is owned by Australia’s Snake Man – Raymond Hoser.

 

Raymond Hoser owns Snakebusters, Australia’s best reptiles displays and shows.

 

(What follows is correct as of 9 March 2012)

 

On 9 March 2012, the Victorian DSE put the lives of Victorians at risk by closing down the State’s leading wildlife education company, by revoking their operating permits.

 

The decision was upheld by a biased VCAT judge who in turn acted in contempt two decisions by other VCAT judges.

 

As a result, Snakebusters is fighting on the overturn the illegal decision, which contravenes several relevant laws.

 

Simultaneously, Snakebusters is seeking to have staff take over the statutory licence functions, enabling Snakebusters to continue.

 

Snakebusters retains interstate licence rights due to posession of relevant permits in those states not dependent on Victorian licences.

 

A summary of the legal history is below:

 

The “compliance branch” and others at the Victorian Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) have engaged in certain activities, that the DSE have traditionally regarded as legal and allowable for all displayers, while prosecuting Raymond Hoser Hoser (Snakebusters) for, including:

 

1 – Displaying venomous snakes without a barrier or “pit” (which has never been defined in any way by the DSE) between the snake and the person and at a distance of less than three metres, more than one venomous snake being held at a time or on display at a time and allowing the public to hold venomous or dangerous reptiles (the last condition of which Hoser was never alleged to have breached, although Zoos Victoria regularly do).

2 – Allowing the public to hold non-venomous reptiles, frogs and other innocuous creatures, which is an activity almost all displayers do daily in Australia, including Zoos Victoria at both Healesville and Melbourne, as does DSE Port Phillip, who have charged Hoser with the same!

 

Summary:

The “compliance branch” and others at the Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) have engaged in certain activities, that the DSE have traditionally regarded as legal and allowable for all displayers, while prosecuting Raymond Hoser Hoser (Snakebusters) for, including:

 

1 – Displaying venomous snakes without a barrier or “pit” (which has never been defined in any way by the DSE) between the snake and the person and at a distance of less than three metres, more than one venomous snake being held at a time or on display at a time and allowing the public to hold venomous or dangerous reptiles (the last condition of which Hoser was never alleged to have breached, although Zoos Victoria regularly do).

2 – Allowing the public to hold non-venomous reptiles, frogs and other innocuous creatures, which is an activity almost all displayers do daily in Australia, including Zoos Victoria at both Healesville and Melbourne, as does DSE Port Phillip, who have charged Hoser with the same!

 

With the ultimate aim of improperly removing a (superior) competitor (and person they have a long-standing hatred for) from the marketplace in the most serious breach of their position’s rules and competitive neutrality.

 

NOTE: Where quotes are made or referred to, we posess all relevant documents, letters, emails, transcripts, recordings, photos, screen dumps, etc to confirm the same.  There is no need to believe a “word” Raymond Hoser says to readily establish the truth by these independent means and see that it corroborates entirely with what follows (see examples of key documents at end of this document, that alone substantiate all key points within).

 

SYNOPSIS:

 

Various sections of the DSE and their controlled entity “Zoos Victoria”, who also engage in live wildlife displays, including the enforcement branch themselves (DSE Port Phillip) are the major competitor of Snakebusters and also their regulator, which is an untenable situation when abused by them as has happened.

 

In 2007 – Hoser alone (in the first instance) and then all other displayers were told that they could no longer do (1) above, and that the rules would be “applied equitably” (see DSE letter).

The rules, first imposed against Hoser were implemented solely to remove the “unfair advantage” (their words), that Hoser had by being the only person in Victoria with surgically devenomized (venomoid) snakes, guaranteeing handler and public safety.
After Hoser complained about the rules being imposed only on him, a second letter was sent to all demonstrators advising all to comply with the new conditions.

To comply with (1) Hoser bought a “pit” as directed by Ron Waters of DSE, which he chose never to define in writing, at a cost of $5,000, and was (alone) directed by Ron Waters to spend $5,000 microchipping his snakes.

Hoser’s compliance with (1) and (2) above was confirmed in writing by DSE in 2007 and VCAT in 2008 (see judgement), the latter confirming the ongoing (and current) legal position of (1) and (2) from 2007 to 2012.

In 2010 – Hoser was charged in relation to both (1) and (2), after being covertly filmed in 2009, the latter being letting people hold non-venomous reptiles. The claim being that this mere act, put wildlife “at risk of theft”, in itself a breach, regardless of any other security present and even when nothing is stolen as was the case in these displays.

Melbourne Zoo and other displayers breached (1) and did (2) regularly and were never charged.
In 2011 – County Court Judge Campton found DSE at fault for not defining a “pit” but Hoser was fined in relation to (2), for which no defence was given.

In late 2011, DSE in a letter confirmed Hoser could legally do (2), but that’s what he’d been charged and convicted of.

In 2012 on the basis of a conviction/s for (1), based on DSE changing their mind about the barriers they had directed Hoser to buy (and not informing him of this change of mind before charging him) (the new claim being the barriers did not constitute a still undefined “pit”) and a conviction/s for (2), Hoser had his permits cancelled by VCAT Judge Pamela Jenkins on 9 March 2012, on the basis of the convictions (as was their right under the wildlife act), enabling Zoos Victoria to remove what they had deemed to be a growing successful competitor.

In other words Hoser had in fact only been found guilty of letting people hold non-venomous reptiles and for this heinous and for everyone else legal (crime), he has been fined $12,000, legal costs in excess of $70,000 and lost his licence and income, with this total in excess of $100,000.

In terms of (1), the DSE was found at fault by the County Court Judge (refer to transcript and judgement).

Notable in terms of (1), it is noteworthy that in 2008, VCAT Judge Coghlan in her judgement  stated that Hoser was allowed to let people hold non-venomous reptiles and yet he was charged in 2010 for exactly that!  More noteworthy is that immediately after the conviction for same in 2011, DSE twice wrote to Hoser saying that letting people hold non-venomous reptiles was allowed.

 

Hoser seeks:

 

1 –DSE and Zoos Victoria to be found guilty of breaching safety rules, rules of administration by failing to define a “pit”, (still undefined as of this date) and competitive neutrality rules (as shown in the images of their displays) and by the conduct of both entities and their staff.

2 – Hoser’s licences to display reptiles restored and compensation for losses arising for their abuse of processes to effectively create rules and entrap him (by deliberately failing to define or advise in terms of them) AND a cessation of the harassment and unfair treatment.

 

Relevant documents are provided here. Many other examples are not, but are available.

 

A more detailed dates chronology is below:

 

DSE/Melbourne Zoo’s ongoing war against Snakebusters - Key points –

·         Feb 2006 – Mike Taylor a reptile keeper at Healesville Sanctuary (Zoos Victoria) attacks a Snakebusters display at the Healesville Timber Festival and is ejected by security at the event.

 

An example of relevant documents in our file that shows clear breaches of rules by the DSE, when cross-referenced and harassment, victimisation and criminalization of Snakebusters:

 

March 2007 – (Letter) DSE sends letter to all demonstrators saying new licence conditions, AKA “the “pit” rules” and others will be enforced “equitably” among all demonstrators.

3 July 2007 – (email) DSE compliance officer Tom Thuys sends e-mail to Hoser confirming Hoser’s barriers are legal as a “pit” and hands-on shows are legal and allowed.

Oct 2008 – (judgement) VCAT Judgement, Judge Coghlan writes, ““His licence allows him to pass around and let people handle his non-venomous species, and to demonstrate more than one non-venomous snake at any time.” And on another page of her judgement she wrote: “For clarification, he is able to hand non-venomous species to the public to handle”. 

June 2010 – (charge sheet) In contravention of the two previous statements, DSE then charge Hoser in terms of his barriers that they now claim are not a “pit” and in contravention of the advice they gave VCAT in 2008, (letting people hold non-venomous reptiles) seen in the judgement.

30 June 2010 – (email) DSE head Ron Waters remains adamant as of that date that he will not be defining a “Pit”.

2011 – (photos with information in a pdf file) A collection of photos from online sources, showing that DSE have not prosecuted their own and other people for doing all the same things Hoser was charged with (in contravention of their own 2007 letter).

6 May 2011 – (letter) Another of many letters to DSE (this one from an MP), seeking to meet DSE to resolve issues – they refused!

9 June 2011 – (transcript) DSE confirm basis of charge against Hoser solely the act of allowing a person to hold non-venomous reptiles (contrary to what VCAT wrote in 2008)

27 July 2011 – (transcript) DSE confirm that they had never defined a “pit”, and yet charged Hoser for complying with their original demands.

4 August 2011 – (judgement) DSE directed to define a pit and yet ignores this.  Points out Hoser complied with all DSE directives.

22 Sept 2011 – (letter) DSE’s Simon Smith writes that Hoser had always been allowed to hand out non-venomous reptiles and yet Hoser had been charged with this (see above).

11 January 2012 – (screen dump) DSE Posts on their own website their own people handing out live snakes to the public (for what Hoser was charged for).

9 March 2012 – VCAT Judge Jenkins, hostile to Hoser cancels all permits in contempt of two earlier VCAT rulings (see above).

 

 

Details – Raymond Hoser (Snakeman)

488 Park Road, Park Orchards, Victoria, 3114

0412 777 211 or (03) 9812 3322

 

http://www.snakebusters.com.au

 

http://www.snakeman.com.au

 

http://www.snakes.pro